Thursday, January 13, 2011

Antimatter

I must first say that the original intent of this blog seems outdated - I have grown (or shrunk) from that mindset. I want to just use this space to put down anything I find interesting which I feel is worth the public's time.

The concept of antimatter has come up a few times in the last few days. There was an article on BBC's website stating that thunderstorms generate antimatter. A photograph showed magical arc-shaped yellow beams above the swirling clouds of a thunderstorm. An antimatter halo, almost. And then, Ed Witten brought antimatter up while discussing the history of string theory. So, what really is this antimatter?? It definitely seems to have caught the interest of all physicists around the world.

The first sentence in Wikipedia's definition of antimatter explains that antimatter is the 'antiparticle' to matter. That raises two questions really - what is the antiparticle? what is matter? A common way of defining matter is anything that has mass and volume. The antiparticle consists of the same mass and OPPOSITE electric charge of a particle. Alright, sounds good.

So, what happens when matter meets antimatter? KABOOM. Both matter and antimatter are annihilated, giving rise to either gamma rays or other particle - antiparticle pairs. This brings up another interesting idea - that radiation, matter and antimatter are three forms of 'existence' of particles. You can get matter and antimatter from radiation and vice versa. With absolutely no idea of experimental observations made on this front, the idea of antimatter is very much like science-fiction to me. Apparently, we have mainly observed just matter - we do not see much antimatter around. As nature seems to like symmetry, there is considerable aversion to the idea that there is so much more matter than antimatter. So... physicists are out to find antimatter.

The Large Hadron Collider was able to generate some antimatter. Stunning project, the LHC. It was able to create antihydrogen - the antiparticle to hydrogen. Understandably, it is very difficult to set up experiments with antimatter as 'explosive annihilation' occurs once they meet matter.

Some scientists propose that there might have been a slight asymmetry between matter and antimatter at the time of the Big Bang with the amount of matter being greater than that of antimatter. Imagine - we are talking about an event close to 14 BILLION YEARS AGO. And we, little specks of mass with life, having an average individual life span of 50 years, are trying to understand the universe. This is exciting. Of course, without sufficient impetus of our species to understand it all in the first place, we are reaching this understanding at a snail's pace.

1 comment:

Nishi said...

snails pace would be right...so the opposite charge-does that mean if it was an electron then the anti-particle would be positively charged?